
When we read the bible, it's fascinating to find that something is missing that we probably would not expect. What's missing? The answer is that when the church gathers together,
preaching is missing.
What I've just asserted may sound at least semi-blasphemous to some people, but when I look in scripture at church gatherings, I simply do not see preaching. In particular, I can't find any place in the bible where a single pastor stands up and preaches in monologue format to a quiet audience.
Clearly, if we look at spiritual gifts, we see that teaching is important in the life of the church. Teaching, however, can take place in many ways during a church gathering that is different from the preaching that we normally experience on Sundays from a pulpit.
Where is monologue style preaching in scripture when the church gathers?
I've heard people try to give examples, but I believe they all fall short for one reason or another.
Some have said that all we have to do is look to multiple places in the Old Testament to see preaching. The problem is that this is not the church. Church gatherings are clearly different from what we see in the O.T. They are New Covenant gathering focused on the person of Jesus Christ. Simply put, the O.T. examples don't apply.
I've heard other people say that Peter preached very clearly in Acts chapters 2-4. I agree that he preached, but he wasn't preaching to the church. Instead, lost people in Israel were the main subjects of his preaching.
What about Acts 20:7 where Paul meets with the church at Troas? Paul went on until midnight. I've heard this verse used to defend long sermons. Part of the problem goes back to the old KJV translation of the verse which says, "And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight." This is a poor translation because the Greek word used for preach carries the meaning of to discuss, to reason, or to dispute. It implies conversation, not one-way communication. In fact, later translations use words other than preach such as "talked" (ESV) or "spoke" (NKJV). Paul spoke for a long time with the church at Troas, but he didn't stand in a pulpit and speak in monologue format.
Another defense of modern-style preaching I've heard comes from II Timothy 4:2 where Paul commands Timothy to "Preach the word!" All translations agree that this is the correct rendering. The church in Ephesus was suffering from some unbiblical doctrines and practices, and Timothy was to preach the word (scriptures) to them. This may at first sound convincing. The problem is that we do not know the context. There is no evidence that Timothy was supposed to stand up at a church gathering and preach in one-way communication to the people of the church. Maybe Paul meant for him to proclaim the truth in small groups or even individually. Because of the uncertainty of the context, it is a leap to use this verse to defend modern preaching.
I write all this because preaching as we know it is almost unquestioned in the modern, evangelical church in the USA. Despite differences in style, almost all churches have, as part of their gatherings, someone stand up and preach to them from some sort of pulpit. One man, usually the pastor, speaks with authority as everyone else sits passively listening. There is no back-and-forth communication. The one man "brings the message from God."
This is problematic for several reasons, but I just want to point out one. The main problem is that this practice is both unquestioned and unbiblical (in the sense that it is not modeled for us in the gathering of the church family). Why do we not even ask why we do something every week when we cannot find it in the scriptures?
I think we all realize that we learn most effectively when we are involved in talking together in conversations and in doing things together regardless of activity. The worst way to learn something is to sit and listen to one-way communication. We've probably all been bored to tears listening to some lecture somewhere. Since this is the case, why do we sit and listen to a lecture in the church gathering?
Wouldn't we all learn a lot better if we all together looked at a passage of scripture? What if we were all free to discuss it? What if we were all free to make application and share this with others? What if the responsibility for teaching rotated instead of only one person doing it?
The scriptures are too deep for any one person to be the expert for everyone else. Let us all look into the bible together and learn from one another. Let's exhort and be exhorted, encourage and be encouraged, teach and be taught, and stir up and be stirred up to love and good works.
Let's be biblical. This includes following what is modeled and what is not - even preaching.