
I like the above image because it shows someone daring to tip over a sacred cow. He must be brave because sacred cow tipping is not welcomed in most circles.
One place that does not generally welcome even the questioning of sacred cows is the church. But what are "sacred cows" anyway? They are traditions that many people love, and therefore do not want challenged in any way, shape, or form.
I've been thinking about specific sacred cows in the American church today. Six of them stand out to me. If you question the biblical basis for these traditions, don't expect your questions to be welcomed. The responses you receive, even from Christians, are likely to be more negative than you imagine.
Here are six sacred cows of the church:
1. The Building
Just take a drive anywhere in this country and you will see multiple, million dollar structures that most people refer to as "churches." These buildings dominate much of the functioning and resources of the churches that gather inside them. If you dare ask what the biblical basis is for the church building, do not expect to be welcomed. You will receive a response something like this, "The early church met in the temple, so we meet in our building." This logic says that churches should build structures because O.T. Israel had a temple. This is faulty at best. Additionally, we don't see any N.T. churches outside of Jerusalem building temples in which to meet.
Many church buildings are beloved. People remember weddings, baptisms, children's musicals, etc. that have taken place there. Therefore, if you question the biblical basis for a church building, watch out. Most people don't even want to think about it.
2. The Worship Service
It used to be that Sunday School was a sacred cow, but many churches are now moving away from it. However, the worship service (or whatever it is called) remains basically unquestioned. I'm referring to a scripted ceremony with a set order. A few people (the "worship leader" and the pastor) do most of the talking from a platform of some sort. The majority of the people sit quietly in pews or rows except when they sing. The order usually goes something like this: welcome and announcements, singing, offering, prayer, sermon, singing, prayer.
The problem is that when we look in the bible we don't see anything like this. Instead, we see a free flowing, informal gathering of the early church where everyone is involved. There is no ceremony or "order of worship." All are invited to participate.
If you question why there is an order of worship, you will get blank stares and/or scowls. The bulletin, after all, needs an order.
3. The Weekly Offering
Each week, as part of the above-mentioned worship service, churches take up offerings (often referred to as "tithes and offerings"). This may be done in varying ways, but the end result is the people contributing money toward the operation of the church. As is clear by a look at any traditional church budget, the vast majority of the offerings go directly to pay for the building and staff salaries.
Again, this is not something we see in the bible. The church gave toward the needs of others. They gave freely, not out of compulsion. The idea of taking up an offering is a foreign concept to the N.T. church.
If you challenge the weekly offering, the response will focus on the need for it in order to pay for the ministries of the church. Of course, most of the ministry is, then, the building and staff salaries.
4. Salaried Pastors
The weekly offering becomes a necessity if a church pays salaries to pastors. This amounts to pragmatics.
Again, the problem is that we don't see this in scripture. Love offerings may have occurred, but full-time salaries did not. If you question this, the response you'll receive will focus on the church wanting to "free up" men for ministry. But, if this is necessary, then why didn't the early church do it?
If you do question pastoral salaries, be ready for a quick response from, you guessed it, the pastors receiving the salaries.
5. The Sermon
Each week as churches across this country gather, one man will stand up in front of the assembly and "bring a message from God." Wow. That sounds impressive. The problem is that, as we have seen before, this is not a N.T. church practice. Simply put, one-direction preaching didn't happen in early church gatherings.
This is a massive sacred cow. If you challenge it, be ready for a not so friendly response.
When the early church gathered, we see many people sharing teachings from scripture. This may have been pastors, but maybe not. Many people taught; nobody preached - especially not a sermon like we see today.
6. Christmas and Easter
WARNING: Watch out! If you challenge these celebrations, get ready for a none-too-happy response.
We know that Christmas has pagan roots. We also know that there is absolutely no biblical basis for celebrating it.
Easter is another man-constructed idea. It is basically a pagan-fertility festival.
The early church got together to celebrate the death and resurrection of Christ each time the gathered. In Acts, as Paul proclaimed the gospel in new locations, he preached (to lost people) about the death and resurrection. These were his twin themes.
The N.T. model is to celebrate what Christ accomplished each time we gather. We don't need a special day for it. We certainly don't need to celebrate his birth.
If Christmas and Easter were important, wouldn't they at least be mentioned as the N.T. church gathered?
If you question these celebrations, get ready for push back in a big way.
So these are six of the church's sacred cows. Can you think of any more?
If we dare, we should also ask, "What sacred cows do I still have in my own life?" Ouch.
24 comments:
Youth and childrens programs. I would guess that people hold stronger convictions in this area than they hold in doctrine.
Bobby,
You are right on. I can't believe I forgot those.
Eric,
I've found that there are different kinds of sacred cows. There are some that affect almost all Christians. Others tend to be more denominational (or non-denominational). And, finally, some like to graze in local churches.
-Alan
Eric,
Twice visiting your country I saw, as in my country, each of these holy bovines, very effectively confusing the Church regarding her identity in Christ. Sadly, they create the conditions for the old military axiom of 'divide and conquer' to hold true.
One of those you didn't mention is particularly odorous: the unquestionable authority of the "office" of pastor and the pronouncements which proceed from that high place.
Another part of the worship service sacred cow would probably be the age-segregated services. This has become a harsh reality in many churches, rending the older from the younger because neither can agree on the kind of singing that is appropriate for worship.
I also wanted to ask you if you could give me just a couple scripture references of bodies of believers coming together with teaching being done by everyone. I'm not saying that I don't believe you, I'm just interested in reading the passages you are considering.
Send the children to another room...yes for sure. That is a big one
Add to the list:
Pedestalizing of cergy over laymen. Pastors are a separate class of spiritual person just as a shepard is human and intelligent and sheep are animals and stupid. Along with this the sacredness of being on the church payroll vs the secular-ness of a marketplace work. Getting you living from the offering plate is "full-time ministry". Marketplace work is not ministry at all.
Chain-of-command leadership. Special titles designate ministry as an "office". Every airplane has a captain, every army a general, every car a driver, blah blah, every church a Sr. Pastor. Servant, example driven leadership is totally scraped.
Perpetual dependency Leadership: You need to have a hired pastor deliver to you a sermon every week of your life until you die. You never grow up to be a teacher yourself. Luke 6:40 and 2Tim. 2:2 are completely nullified.
No questions, no comments, no personal illustrations, no objections, no corrections, no interruptions, no anything in the pew but listening during the "teaching".
On point 3: There were gatherings of offerings in the N.T. It's just that every penny went beyond the givers to the needs of others beyond the givers. I have a little graph from Leadership Journal that shows systemically it is all considered "normal" to devote 78% of the "giving" to buy goodies primarily for the "givers". I call it pooling rather than giving.
One of the BAZAR things God used to open my eyes to this corruption of giving was an advertisement in my cell phone bill. I have a graphic of it if you want it. It said in a glitzy font "It is better to give and receive." I knew this was a perversion of a line from the Bible. When I looked it up in Acts 20 I was blown away. Paul quotes Jesus as saying "it is more blessed to give than receive." This was one of his proofs for refusing the right to be paid and he was instructing the Ephesian elders to follow his example. As a layman, I was doing what the corrupt ad said - putting money in the offering plate and getting back a weekly Bible lecture, pro-driven worship experience, expert youth setup for my boys, etc. I realized I was just as corrupt as that ad in my "giving". I asked God to show my how I could do church with 100% of my giving going beyond myself. God totally laid it all out from His Word.
If American believers could understand this simple reality, the kingdom of God would explode in fruitfulness around the globe.
Alan,
I think I've seen them all. Good breakdown.
John,
I'm not sure whose most to blame for the high view of the pastoral office - the pastor or the people. Either way, it certainly is a sacred cow.
John M.,
I agree about the problem of age-segregated services. Yuck.
As for teaching one another, we can look to I Corinthians 14:26. This is an extremely critical verse because it falls in the context of the church gathering. Paul writes, "How is it then, brethren? Whenever you come together, each of you has a psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification." Paul mentions "each of you" and "has a teaching."
Also in the context of church gatherings, the author of Hebrews writes in 10:24-25, "And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near." Although the word teach is not used here, stirring up and encouraging have teaching components.
I hope that helps.
Tim,
I agree with you about the clergy's special status, the passive laity, and the mistaken giving. It is all symptomatic of the problems in the American church today.
My heart skipped a beat as I posted some thoughts on Tithing today... and then linked to it in my Facebook status. Posting to my blog feels relatively safe since I know most people that disagree with me don't visit my blog regularly. But yeah, I don't really enjoy sacred cow tipping when it may harm some relationships. But I feel there is some value to pushing these discussions into the public arena.
I fear the money sacred cow may be one of the biggest. If the 'church' thinks it needs a budget to function... and someone questions their right to the pockets of the members...
I pray for grace, understanding, and wisdom as we approach these sacred cows.
A few more sacred cows...
Believers insisting to taking time and money to bury their dead when Jesus said let the unbelievers worry about them - Matthew 8:22.
Women speaking in church gatherings when the bible says they are to keep silent in church meetings - 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:12.
Women braiding their hair and wearing gold, pearls, or costly clothing - 1 Timothy 2:9, 1 Peter 3:3.
Women praying with uncovered or unshaved heads - 1 Corinthians 11:5–10.
Refusal to sell possessions in order to give the money to those who have greater need - Matthew 19:21 – Acts 2:45.
Owning anything (personal possessions) such as land, home, vehicles, etc. - Acts 4:32.
Asceticism/Stoicism
One of the most sacred cows is proclaiming other peoples cows as sacred, while claiming our own cows are - well - “sacred” Col. 2:20–23, 1 Tim. 4:1–4, 8.
Brother Scott ><>
Eric,
As somebody who used to sit at the mixing board and record the sermons, either a 45 or 60 minute sermon was sacred, depending on what length cassette tapes the church used.
Jonathan,
Wow. You are brave to link to your Facebook. I tend to only link my blog posts to Facebook when i think they are safe.
As for money, you are probably right. Don't touch that one.
I agree with you about trying to discuss these things with grace. It is difficult when so many others are unwilling to talk about them.
Scott,
Wow. That is a long list. Which of them do you agree with and which do you not?
Steve,
The interesting thing about sermons is that they are seen as sacred AND they bore many people. Let's face it, it is difficult to sit there quietly and listen to one person lecture to you for 30 minutes or more.
Eric:
In support of your idea that church gatherings should be participatory, you consistently cite 1 Cor 14:26. In context, don't you think Paul is telling these Corinthians what they were doing in their assemblies, not what they should be doing, and that what they were doing was, in fact, not good? In other words, he admonishes them that they should do all things decently and in order (v.40) and that if the whole church does speak in tongues (for example), then unbelievers will conclude that they are mad (v.23). In this chapter, Paul is calling for some order to the chaos ("two or three at the most" should speak in tongues or prophecy, vv.27,29, not everyone).
Are there other passages you would cite to support your idea of everyone sharing in the teaching? Because I fear the passage you cite here is saying the exact opposite of what you are taking it to say.
Blessings,
Mark
Mark,
I'll respectfully have to disagree with you about I Corinthians 14:26. It is clear that there were some problems with the Corinthian church gatherings. They needed more order. The interesting thing about 14:26 is that Paul doesn't tell them to stop doing these things. He simply commands them to all things for edification. The apostle could easily have told them to stop and follow some sort of set order or only let a few people speak, but he does not do this.
Part of our difficulty, of course, is that the New Testament is fairly sparse in its discussion of what actually happened at gatherings.
I will say that Hebrews 10:24-25 is crucial. In the gathering, they were to stir up one another and encourage one another. These have teaching components to them.
Eric:
I believe I have to challenge your assertion that:
"The apostle could easily have told them to stop and follow some sort of set order or only let a few people speak, but he does not do this."
Actually, he does: "Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others pass judgment" (14:29). He does say "each of you" and "has a teaching" but does that necessarily mean that he is saying that this is right or good?
Also, you said:
"The interesting thing about 14:26 is that Paul doesn't tell them to stop doing these things."
Two things here: (1) if you notice the command, "Let two or three prophets speak..." (v.29), he actually is telling them to stop what they were doing ("Each one..." v.26). And (2) neither does he tell them to continue doing things the same way; i.e. everyone having a psalm, teaching, revelation, tongue, interpretation. His point at the beginning of v.26, "What then?" is meant to be "In light of what I am trying to teach you about order, how is it that when you come together there is all this chaos, with everyone singing, preaching, speaking in tongues, etc. at the same time?"
Again, are there any other passages you would cite which may be somewhat more clearly teaching that "everyone" (your word) can feel free to teach when the church gathers? "Provoking one another to love and good deeds" (Heb 10:24-25) may or may not have teaching components to them. Teaching is not mentioned in that text.
Blessings,
Mark
Mark,
I agree about 14:29. He is speaking about words of prophecy. There is a back-and-forth participatory nature of the gathering. Paul caps the number of prophecies given. I don't see this restriction on teachings.
I've heard your interpretation before - that this is Paul telling them to stop having everyone involved. I just don't see that happening in the passage. The keys are order and edification. I disagree that everyone participating is equated with chaos. The Corinthian manner may have been chaotic, but Paul doesn't restrict, for example, teaching.
As for other passages, as I said the church gathering is mentioned sparsely in the N.T. We must take what we are given. I Corinthians shows us all we need. However, as I previously mentioned we see participation by everyone mentioned in Hebrews 10.
On the flip side, are there passages that focus on the church gathering where the teaching is restricted to just a few people?
(On this issue, by the way, I'm not suggesting that women should teach to gatherings. I think Paul is clear about this in I Timothy 2.)
Hi Mark,
I recently had this discussion with a friend. I can sort of see how it can be read either way. But I don't think it is going as far as typical church services have gone. I don't see this passage saying everyone shouldn't be contributing something to the gathering.
They were each contributing something. They are being told to do so with a sense of order. I don't see anyone being told to remain quiet (except the women).
Likely they didn't have to worry about 200 people participating. Since men were only allowed to talk. What would fill an average home? 10 men, 10 women, 20 kids? If 3 are speaking in tongues, a few are interpretting, and 3 are prophesying, that is almost all the men. Some of the others at the gathering may have taken the lead with prayer, hyms, hospitality, encouragment, overseeing....
Hope that helps some.
Eric,
Interesting discussion between you and Mark here.
If we only look at 1 Corinthians 14:26-40, we see at least 7 people speaking: three speaking in tongues, at least one (possibly more) interpreting the tongues, and at least three prophesying. However, Paul also includes that others should weigh the prophecy... so that would be more than 7 people speaking. As you've mentioned, Paul does not tell us how many should bring psalms or teaching. Let's assume he would use the same principles: that would mean 3 people bringing songs/psalms and 3 people teaching. So far, we're up to at least 13 people speaking when the church meets, just from 1 Corinthians 14:26-40. That's certainly more than I've seen at every church that I've met with (except one).
But, there's another part of this discussion. When we say someone teaches, we usually think of lecture style teaching, which means that one person speaks and everyone else is quiet. Is that what Paul meant? Perhaps. But, perhaps not. We have several examples of Paul speaking to unbelievers. But, we don't have many example of how Paul taught the church. There are two striking examples however.
1) In Acts 19:9, we see Paul and the disciples of Jesus leaving the synagogue to meet in the Hall of Tyrannus (not a home, by the way). It says that Paul continued "reasoning" with them (according to the ESV). This same verb is used to describe Paul's speech among the Jews in the synagogue in Acts 19:8. What does this verb mean? Well, it has a wide range of meaning, but it is the source of our verb "dialogue". It could mean anything from a dialogue between two people to a discussion between many, to an all out argument. In essence, the verb indicates that more than one person was taking part in the speaking.
2) Using the same verb (dialegomai, if you're interested) Luke describes how Paul spoke to the church in Troas in both Acts 20:7 and Acts 20:9 (translated "talked" in ESV).
In both of these examples of Paul speaking to the church, a verb is used to indicate dialogue or discussion. How many people were speaking during this time? It's hard to say.
So, just looking at these three passages, it seems clear that several people spoke (in order and without chaos) when the church met in the NT.
-Alan
Alan and Jonathan,
Thanks for adding to the discussion.
Mark is asking an important question that we need to be able to answer.
Mark,
Here's another verse:
Colossians 3:16, "Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God."
Post a Comment